Seventh Circuit· 4/1/2013
United States v. Jon Burge
Citations
- 711 F.3d 803
- 2013 WL 1285582
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving district court’s decision to exclude hearsay testimony offered- under Rule 807 where the out-of-court declarants “had a motive to testify falsely to exculpate themselves”
- false interrogatory answers made during civil discovery process constitute obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)
- “The expansive language in this provision operates as a catch-all to cover ‘otherwise’ obstructive behavior that might not fall within the definition of document destruction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2015-02-25· cited 364×
- Darrell Cannon v. Jon BurgeSeventh Circuit· 2014-05-27· cited 79×
- Moore Ex Rel. Estate of Jones v. BurgeSeventh Circuit· 2014-11-13· cited 78×
- United States v. Anthony VolpendestoSeventh Circuit· 2014-03-24· cited 77×
- United States v. Walter LiewNinth Circuit· 2017-05-05· cited 40×
- People ex rel. Madigan v. BurgeIllinois Supreme Court· 2014-10-24· cited 39×
- United States v. Joseph FischerD.C. Circuit· 2023-04-07· cited 32×
- Smith v. BurgeN.D. Illinois· 2016-11-28· cited 29×
- United States v. Maurice D. MooreSeventh Circuit· 2016-05-27· cited 21×
- United States v. Heon Seok LeeSeventh Circuit· 2019-08-21· cited 17×
- United States v. Ruby ParkerSeventh Circuit· 2013-05-23· cited 16×
- Darnell Dixon v. Tarry WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 2024-02-20· cited 14×
- Flextronics International, USA, Inc. v. Sparkling Drink Systems Innovation Center Ltd.N.D. Illinois· 2017-02-09· cited 10×
- People v. PlummerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-08-20· cited 9×
- United States v. Maurice WithersSeventh Circuit· 2020-05-28· cited 7×
- United States v. WillisSeventh Circuit· 2017-08-18· cited 6×
- United States v. HollnagelN.D. Illinois· 2013-07-01· cited 2×
- Smith v. WilliamsN.D. Illinois· 2015-06-03· cited 1×
- United States v. Antwon WillisSeventh Circuit· 2017-08-18
- United States v. SandlinDistrict of Columbia· 2021-12-10
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 1,786×
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 482×
- United States v. AguilarSupreme Court· 1995-06-21· cited 410×
- Erlenbaugh v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-12-12· cited 341×
- United States v. Joan McKennaNinth Circuit· 2003-04-18· cited 219×
- United States v. Roger G. GalbraithSeventh Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 136×
- United States v. John SinclairSeventh Circuit· 1996-01-10· cited 96×
- United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1999-01-26· cited 90×
- United States v. David Wayne Holland, Cross-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1994-05-24· cited 88×
- United States v. Calvin Trennell, A/K/A MeechieSeventh Circuit· 2002-07-01· cited 88×
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Pigee, Ramon Webb, and Denishha Ann LipscombSeventh Circuit· 1999-12-10· cited 84×
- United States v. Eugene Johnson, Also Known as GenoSeventh Circuit· 2000-09-13· cited 79×
- United States v. Randall Ray WilloughbySeventh Circuit· 1994-06-17· cited 59×
- United States v. Perry ReichSecond Circuit· 2007-03-02· cited 58×
- United States v. MatthewsSeventh Circuit· 2007-10-11· cited 52×
- United States v. Steven A. Kuna, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1985-04-25· cited 47×
- United States v. DeLeonSeventh Circuit· 2010-05-04· cited 43×
- United States v. Ratliff-WhiteSeventh Circuit· 2007-07-10· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.