Skip to main content
· 4/1/2013

United States v. Jon Burge

Citations

  • 711 F.3d 803
  • 2013 WL 1285582
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving district court’s decision to exclude hearsay testimony offered- under Rule 807 where the out-of-court declarants “had a motive to testify falsely to exculpate themselves”
  • false interrogatory answers made during civil discovery process constitute obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2)
  • “The expansive language in this provision operates as a catch-all to cover ‘otherwise’ obstructive behavior that might not fall within the definition of document destruction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.