Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fifth Circuit· 8/5/1994

United States v. Johnson

Citations

  • 29 F.3d 940
  • 1994 WL 419143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that motion that had no hearing was taken under advisement on day last paper concerning the motion was filed with the court
  • approving of a dismissal without prejudice for a defendant who, although doing nothing actively to cause the delay, did not press his right to a speedy trial
  • approving of a dismissal without prejudice for a defendant who, although doing nothing actively to cause the delay, did not press his right to a speedy trial
  • allowing limited exclusions for periods of delay under Subsection F for a motion in limine, a motion for a bill of particulars, and a motion to suppress evidence
  • 188-day delay in bringing defendant to trial did not necessitate dismissal with prejudice where delay was unintentional and government did not act in bad faith
  • “As noted above, the defendant has the burden of providing adequate proof to support his motion to dismiss [for a violation of the Speedy Trial Act].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Jolly, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.