Skip to main content
· 11/4/2003

United States v. Jonathon Marc Sutter

Citations

  • 340 F.3d 1022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion without a hearing where defendant’s argument was entirely without merit
  • holding that “a pro forma discovery motion” cannot be continued or under advisement indefinitely
  • holding that “a pro forma discovery motion” cannot be continued or under advisement indefinitely
  • noting that, in the absence of a pending discovery dispute on which the court needs to rule, official docket continuances and ongoing discovery alone are insufficient to toll the Speedy Trial Act clock
  • “[A] pro forma discovery motion ‘continued’ merely ‘in case’ future discovery disputes arise is under advisement, because the motion is not set for a hearing nor is the court awaiting any ascertainable materials.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Berzon, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.