· 4/26/1995
United States v. Paul Douglas Tannehill
Citations
- 49 F.3d 1049
- 1995 WL 134603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that where defendants requested a hearing, it was unnecessary to determine whether the hearing was “required” for STA purposes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Barksdale, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.