Eighth Circuit· 1/6/1975
United States v. John
Citations
- 508 F.2d 1134
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interception of communications only when it was determined by physical surveillance that a suspect was using the pay telephone
- interception of communications only when it was determined by physical surveillance that a suspect was using the pay telephone
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heaney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Earl Watson, Tony Maxwell and Mae Lillian BrownTenth Circuit· 1979-05-01· cited 165×
- United States v. Eugene C. Kirk, Sr.Eighth Circuit· 1976-05-17· cited 157×
- United States v. Anthony v. DalyEighth Circuit· 1976-05-05· cited 88×
- United States v. Clyde SmithEighth Circuit· 1980-12-23· cited 74×
- James L. Hodge v. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Foreign CorporationNinth Circuit· 1977-06-08· cited 61×
- State v. FaehnrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-12-19· cited 59×
- United States v. George Lawson and Ronald ScharfSeventh Circuit· 1975-08-20· cited 55×
- State v. BrennenNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-10-12· cited 44×
- Arnold v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-06-02· cited 40×
- United States v. Nicodemo ScarfoThird Circuit· 2022-07-15· cited 40×
- United States v. Russell v. Losing, Jr., United States of America v. Donald Ray FeickEighth Circuit· 1976-07-30· cited 39×
- United States v. BergdollD. Delaware· 1976-03-10· cited 38×
- State v. HoadleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-08-21· cited 37×
- United States v. JohnsonD.C. Circuit· 1976-06-21· cited 34×
- United States v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Eighth Circuit· 1976-12-09· cited 28×
- United States v. Richard Lee KnightEighth Circuit· 1977-01-20· cited 25×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-12-04· cited 21×
- United States v. William L. Riddick and Thomas B. WallaceEighth Circuit· 1975-07-15· cited 11×
- United States v. Van HornD. Nebraska· 1984-01-30· cited 9×
- Application of United StatesW.D. Missouri· 1976-01-19· cited 9×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 898×
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 348×
- Galvan v. LevineSupreme Court· 1974-06-03· cited 233×
- United States v. Larry KnohlSecond Circuit· 1967-06-22· cited 174×
- William Spinelli v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1967-09-12· cited 172×
- United States v. CoxEighth Circuit· 1972-06-05· cited 162×
- United States v. Joseph ManfrediSecond Circuit· 1973-11-23· cited 160×
- Marion Francis Fountain and Roosevelt Tremble v. United States of America, Eugene J. Marshall v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1968-01-08· cited 128×
- United States v. Richard Michael King, AKA Richard HansenNinth Circuit· 1973-02-28· cited 116×
- United States v. Curtis Charles Overshon and John OvershonEighth Circuit· 1974-04-30· cited 111×
- Abraham L. Koolish, David F. Koolish and John B. Carnell v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1965-02-25· cited 106×
- United States v. Thomas W. PhillipsEighth Circuit· 1970-10-14· cited 92×
- United States v. Richard Kay HarpelTenth Circuit· 1974-03-12· cited 89×
- White v. CardwellSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 86×
- United States v. BrickEighth Circuit· 1974-08-15· cited 84×
- United States v. Robert T. CarsonSecond Circuit· 1972-07-07· cited 79×
- Johnson v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade CountySupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 68×
- United States v. William c.wolkEighth Circuit· 1972-08-30· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.