United States v. George Lawson and Ronald Scharf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \the function of the post-interception procedural requirements is to preserve the integrity of the intercepted conversations and to prevent any tampering or editing of the tapes\
• “the function of the post-interception procedural requirements is to preserve the integrity of the intercepted conversations and to prevent any tampering or editing of the tapes”
• 57-day delay excusable since purpose of statute, to insure the integrity of tapes, was accomplished
• admitting recordings after fifty-seven-day delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).