Eighth Circuit· 8/15/1974
United States v. Brick
Citations
- 502 F.2d 219
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Nor is such use controlled by 47 U.S.C. § 605, as amended.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bright, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,038×
- United States v. Maneer LeonSixth Circuit· 1976-04-02· cited 233×
- United States v. TurnerNinth Circuit· 1975-07-24· cited 178×
- United States v. JacksonEighth Circuit· 1977-02-08· cited 164×
- United States v. Eugene C. Kirk, Sr.Eighth Circuit· 1976-05-17· cited 157×
- United States v. VentoThird Circuit· 1976-03-16· cited 145×
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-04-01· cited 142×
- United States v. GarciaEighth Circuit· 1986-02-25· cited 120×
- United States v. Rogelio QuintanaSeventh Circuit· 1975-02-26· cited 104×
- United States v. Richard A. TonryFifth Circuit· 1979-10-09· cited 96×
- United States v. Michael William CleggFifth Circuit· 1975-03-05· cited 95×
- United States v. Anthony v. DalyEighth Circuit· 1976-05-05· cited 88×
- United States v. Fabio Alonso, Pedro Izaguirre, Robert Derringer, Julio OjedaEleventh Circuit· 1984-08-30· cited 80×
- United States v. HawesFifth Circuit· 1976-03-29· cited 62×
- James L. Hodge v. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Foreign CorporationNinth Circuit· 1977-06-08· cited 61×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1976-06-29· cited 51×
- United States v. CivellaEighth Circuit· 1976-04-16· cited 46×
- United States v. DiMuroTenth Circuit· 1976-06-29· cited 44×
- United States v. Steve Thomas, United States of America v. Frank Schullo and Anthony PetrangeloEighth Circuit· 1975-04-28· cited 43×
- United States of America, Applicant-Appellee v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Movant-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1976-02-23· cited 42×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 898×
- United States v. KahnSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 457×
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 348×
- Robert Michael Woosley v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1973-04-24· cited 179×
- United States v. CoxEighth Circuit· 1972-06-05· cited 162×
- August v. BronsteinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 126×
- United States v. Richard Becker and Jack EisenSecond Circuit· 1972-05-30· cited 122×
- United States v. SmaldoneTenth Circuit· 1973-10-12· cited 117×
- United States v. Louis B. Pacheco and John N. Fountain, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1974-03-07· cited 112×
- United States v. FocarileD. Maryland· 1972-02-22· cited 103×
- United States v. John Jacob BoboFourth Circuit· 1973-04-23· cited 100×
- United States v. SaccoNinth Circuit· 1974-01-30· cited 91×
- Heltsley v. District No. 23, United Mine WorkersSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 81×
- United States v. EscandarS.D. Florida· 1970-11-03· cited 65×
- United States v. Cecil Eugene Harris, A/K/A \Red\ HarrisFifth Circuit· 1972-06-19· cited 62×
- United States v. Vincent Peter PisacanoSecond Circuit· 1972-04-07· cited 59×
- United States v. Earl Christopher Hunter, United States of America v. Hyland HillSeventh Circuit· 1973-06-13· cited 57×
- United States v. Thomas Anthony Ceraso, in No. 72-1279 Appeal of Beverly Ceraso, in 72-1280. Appeal of John E. Troutman, in 72-1284Third Circuit· 1972-08-16· cited 52×
- United States v. J. W. RobinsonFifth Circuit· 1973-01-16· cited 38×
- United States v. Lawrence McHaleSeventh Circuit· 1974-04-08· cited 32×
Other cases named United States v. Brick
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.