Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 8/10/2017

United States v. Jiten Nanda

Citations

  • 867 F.3d 522
  • 2017 WL 3431721
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen a district court entertains arguments as to the proper guidelines range and explicitly states that it would have given the same sentence it did regardless, any error in the range calculation is harmless.” (citations omitted)
  • “[W]hen a district court entertains arguments as to the proper guidelines range and explicitly states that it would have given the same sentence it did regardless, any error in the range calculation is harmless.” (citations omitted)
  • “We have repeatedly held that, when a district court entertains arguments as to the proper guidelines range and explicitly states that it would have given the same sentence it did regardless, any error in the range calculation is harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Jones, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.