United States v. Booker Powell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a ruling on a motion to suppress may be affirmed on any ground established by the record
• concluding that, the statement made by Powell, that he just returned from picking up his child, was additional circumstantial evidence that the minor was used to avoid detection
• describing the first step under Terry as a determination that “stopping the vehicle was initially justified by reasonable suspicion”
• explaining that a Bruton violation does not mandate reversal
• explaining appellant’s disagreement with how factors were balanced insufficient to disturb sentence
• stating this court may affirm on any basis established by the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).