United States v. John Russell Webster, Jr., Delbert Paul Hoskins, Robert Bode and John Jay Caperton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a wiretap order based on affi-ant’s statement that physical surveillance had not disclosed the target’s drug source, continued surveillance carried a risk of detection, and infiltration was risky and dangerous
• when claims of 4 As grounds for the motion for the continuance, Kelly pointed out that his counsel had a conflict with the October 29, 1990 trial date, as his counsel had another trial set in federal court on this same date. In addition, Kelly stated that: (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).