Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 10/7/2016

United States v. Jesse Kaplan

Citations

  • 839 F.3d 795
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18247
  • 2016 WL 5859856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “discussing the intangible, sentimental nature and difficulty in 10 || replacing certain personal property”
  • \It is within the district court's discretion to determine the proper method of calculating the value of such property when ordering restitution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A.\
  • “[I]t would be an abuse of discretion for a district court to issue a restitution award that makes a victim more than whole, such as by awarding a windfall.”
  • “Where property is personal or unique, or neither fungible nor easily sold on a viable market, district courts should be permitted the discretion to make victims whole by determining an appropriate measure of value under the circumstances of the case before them.”
  • reviewing findings of fact for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, McKeown, Ezra

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.