Eighth Circuit· 2/16/2021
United States v. Jerome Ruzicka
Citations
- 988 F.3d 997
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that non-binding authority is insufficient to show a proposition is clear or obvious
- “We do not consider claims that a party fails meaningfully to develop or argue on appeal.” (citation omitted)
- “We do not consider claims that a party fails ‘meaningfully [to] develop or argue’ on appeal.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sarah Watkins v. City of St. Louis, MissouriEighth Circuit· 2024-05-29· cited 35×
- United States v. Tevin MaurstadEighth Circuit· 2022-06-03· cited 11×
- United States v. Marcin GarbaczEighth Circuit· 2022-04-27· cited 10×
- United States v. Bradley MathenyEighth Circuit· 2022-07-28· cited 10×
- United States v. Charleton MaxwellEighth Circuit· 2023-03-01· cited 9×
- United States v. Mario SpencerEighth Circuit· 2021-05-25· cited 7×
- United States v. Moshe PoratThird Circuit· 2023-08-07· cited 7×
- United States v. Ledra CraigEighth Circuit· 2024-03-01· cited 1×
- United States v. Okwuchukwu JidoeforEighth Circuit· 2024-04-10· cited 1×
- United States v. Douglas TurnerEighth Circuit· 2025-01-14
- United States v. Armando CheshierEighth Circuit· 2025-04-10
- United States v. John NockEighth Circuit· 2025-08-07
- United States v. Harold KaedingEighth Circuit· 2026-03-27
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,390×
- Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 394×
- In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-11-09· cited 127×
- United States v. PoitraEighth Circuit· 2011-08-10· cited 97×
- Kelly v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2020-05-07· cited 79×
- United States v. Donovan NewEighth Circuit· 2007-07-18· cited 77×
- United States v. AliNinth Circuit· 2010-08-25· cited 73×
- United States v. FioritoEighth Circuit· 2011-05-23· cited 64×
- United States v. DoeSecond Circuit· 2008-08-13· cited 63×
- United States v. Jose Santos Quintanilla, United States of America v. Juan Torres VelasquezEighth Circuit· 1994-06-03· cited 60×
- Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-06-27· cited 58×
- United States v. MartinEighth Circuit· 1995-10-04· cited 57×
- United States v. Donald SteffenEighth Circuit· 1981-02-19· cited 55×
- United States v. TakhalovEleventh Circuit· 2016-10-03· cited 54×
- United States v. Mark L. Shyres, United States of America v. Joseph E. Martino, United States of America v. Michael A. OrloffEighth Circuit· 1990-03-14· cited 49×
- United States v. Michael Dennis ViethEighth Circuit· 2005-02-08· cited 44×
- Robert Milligan v. City of Red Oak, IowaEighth Circuit· 2000-10-16· cited 34×
- United States v. Nancy SadlerSixth Circuit· 2014-04-24· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.