United States v. Jeffery Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting a previous version of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11
• “Bennett’s mental state, therefore, may be supported to the satisfaction of Rule 11[(b)(3)] by circumstantial evidence establishing his knowledge and intent.”
• “From these and other facts contained in the PSR and in [a cooperating witness’s] testimony, the district court could easily have inferred that Bennett had the required mental state to have knowingly possessed methamphetamine with the intent to distribute it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).