United States v. Javier Munoz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “No defendant could reasonably expect that he could abscond for five years and still hold the government to its promises under the plea agreement.”
• “No defendant could reasonably expect that he could abscond for five years and still hold the government to its promises under the plea agreement.”
• “No defendant could reasonably expect that he could abscond for five years and still hold the government to its promises under the plea agreement.”
• “No defendant could reasonably expect that he could abscond for five years and still hold the government to its promises under the plea agreement.”
• the government must uphold its own promises that it makes to induce a guilty plea
• “When Munoz fled the country and spent nearly five years as a fugitive in Mexico, he breached what we believe was an implied but obvious term of the plea agreement that he remain in the country and show up for sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).