Skip to main content
· 7/17/2014

United States v. Garrett Smith

Citations

  • 759 F.3d 702
  • 2014 WL 3519076
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The sole type of ineffectiveness claim we have said that a defendant may not waive is an ineffectiveness- claim having to do with the waiver (or the plea agreement as a whole) and its negotiation.”
  • “When the defendant pursuant to the plea agreement has knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights, and the terms of that waiver are express and unambiguous, we will enforce those terms.”
  • “The sole type of ineffectiveness claim we have said that a defendant may not waive is an ineffectiveness claim having to do with the waiver (or the plea agreement as a whole) and its negotiation.”
  • “The sole type of ineffectiveness claim we have said that a defendant may not waive is an ineffectiveness claim having to do with the waiver (or the plea agreement as a whole) and its negotiation.”
  • “The sole type of ineffectiveness claim we have said that a defendant may not waive is an ineffectiveness claim having to do with the waiver (or the plea 12 No. 14‐3019 agreement as a whole) and its negotiation.”
  • “The sole type of ineffectiveness claim we have said that a defendant may not waive is an ineffectiveness claim having to do with the waiver (or the plea agreement as a whole) and its negotiation.” (citing Hurlow v. United States, 726 F.3d 958, 964–66 (7th Cir. 2013))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: PerCuriam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.