Skip to main content
· 9/19/2003

United States v. Paul Kelly

Citations

  • 337 F.3d 897
  • 2003 WL 21710254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court’s failure to hold evidentiary hearing to ascertain whether defendant breached plea agreement was harmless when it was clear defendant breached agreement
  • applying this factor in determining the materiality of a defendant’s breach of a plea agreement
  • “In general, a defendant’s substantial breach of an unambiguous term of a plea agreement frees the government to rescind the deal.”
  • the defendant’s refusal to participate in a “ride-along” to identify codefendants was a substantial breach of his plea agreement where the defendant did not allege that the government’s request was made in bad faith or that his participation would endanger him or his family
  • the defendant's refusal to participate in a \ride-along\ to identify codefendants was a substantial breach of his plea agreement where the defendant did not allege that the government's request was made in bad faith or that his participation would endanger him or his family

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Kanne, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.