· 9/19/2003
United States v. Paul Kelly
Citations
- 337 F.3d 897
- 2003 WL 21710254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court’s failure to hold evidentiary hearing to ascertain whether defendant breached plea agreement was harmless when it was clear defendant breached agreement
- applying this factor in determining the materiality of a defendant’s breach of a plea agreement
- “In general, a defendant’s substantial breach of an unambiguous term of a plea agreement frees the government to rescind the deal.”
- the defendant’s refusal to participate in a “ride-along” to identify codefendants was a substantial breach of his plea agreement where the defendant did not allege that the government’s request was made in bad faith or that his participation would endanger him or his family
- the defendant's refusal to participate in a \ride-along\ to identify codefendants was a substantial breach of his plea agreement where the defendant did not allege that the government's request was made in bad faith or that his participation would endanger him or his family
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Kanne, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.