Eleventh Circuit· 1/31/2000
United States v. Jamieson
Citations
- 202 F.3d 1293
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1278
- 2000 WL 103370
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “This court reviews the district court’s findings of fact for clear error and its application of the sentencing guidelines to those facts de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox, Dubina, Kravitch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. AveryTenth Circuit· 2002-07-09· cited 153×
- United States v. Imran MandhaiEleventh Circuit· 2004-07-02· cited 95×
- United States v. Jean Carlo FerreiraEleventh Circuit· 2001-12-11· cited 65×
- United States v. WilliamsEleventh Circuit· 2003-08-05· cited 63×
- United States v. Myat MaungEleventh Circuit· 2001-09-25· cited 49×
- United States v. Edward RodriguezEleventh Circuit· 2002-01-15· cited 38×
- United States v. Adriana Maria BurgosEleventh Circuit· 2001-12-21· cited 12×
- United States v. Aaron Larmar RogersEleventh Circuit· 2000-09-29
- United States v. Robert Wilson HumberEleventh Circuit· 2001-07-05
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawSixth Circuit· 1997-11-21· cited 240×
- Navegar, Incorporated and Penn Arms, Incorporated v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1997-01-03· cited 145×
- United States v. GalloEleventh Circuit· 1999-11-17· cited 82×
- United States v. TillmonEleventh Circuit· 1999-11-10· cited 20×
Other cases named United States v. Jamieson
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.