United States v. Myat Maung

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Allowing the defendant’s own bad faith delay to foreclose the entry of a restitution order could conceivably put restitution in some cases in the defendant’s own discretion.”
• invalidating restitution order entered more than 90 days after sentencing but reserving question whether restitution could be validly entered after the deadline if the delay was caused by the “defendant’s bad faith delay”
• finding dis- trict court generally must enter restitution order within ninety days but noting \we are not willing to say that the 90-day limitation is inexora- ble and can never be equitably tolled\
• “[W]e are not willing to say that the 90-day limitation is inexorable and can never be equitably tolled.”
• \[W]e are not willing to say that the 90-day limitation is inexorable and can never be equitably tolled.\
• “[T]here is no prejudice requirement in [§ 3664(d)(5)], and we are not convinced that we should read one into it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).