Navegar, Incorporated and Penn Arms, Incorporated v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiffs had standing in a pre-enforcement challenge to a statute that “prohibit[ed] weapons that only the [plaintiffs] make”
• holding threat of penalties may make case justiciable in a declaratory judgment action
• holding threat of penalties may make case justiciable in a declaratory judgment action
• noting, with respect to the second part of the statute, that “[i]n the absence of this factor, the threat of prosecution becomes far less imminent”
• “[N]othing ... indicates any special priority placed upon preventing these parties from engaging in specified conduct.”
• finding pre- enforcement standing where statute limited items made by single company, but not on the basis of statutory restriction of general categories of items

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).