Skip to main content
· 1/31/1972

United States v. James Herbert Duffy

Citations

  • 454 F.2d 809
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When the disputed evidence, such as the shirt in this case, is an object bearing a mark or inscription, and is, therefore, a chattel and a writing, the trial judge has discretion to treat the evidence as a chattel or as a writing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Coleman, Simpson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.