United States v. Firouz Yamin and Behroz Geramian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no clear error in jury instruction that the prosecution “is not required to prove that the defendant ever had an intent to deceive or defraud anyone”
• rejecting defendant’s argument that there must be “actual confusion” and finding the evidence sufficient for a jury to determine that imitation goods, once sold, “had the potential to deceive’or to cause confusion or mistake” (emphasis added)
• original document rule prevents inaccuracy and fraud in an attempt to prove the contents of a writing
• original document rule prevents inaccuracy and fraud in an attempt to prove the contents of a writing
• purpose is to prevent fraud
• purpose is to prevent fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).