Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 5/23/2022

United States v. Ignacio Jimenez-Shilon

Citations

  • 34 F.4th 1042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 922(g)(5) does not violate the Second Amendment and collecting cases from seven other circuits holding the same
  • assuming that “the people” includes unlawfully present aliens but concluding that the right codified by the Second Amendment is a “citizen’s right”
  • observing “even . . . dangerous felons and those suffering from mental illness” are “indisputably part of ‘the people’”
  • collecting various Framing-era sources that “refer to arms-bearing as a citizen’s right that was closely associated with national fealty and membership in the body politic” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • collecting Founding-era dictionary definitions that pro- vide some support for the Verdugo-Urquidez definition
  • collecting Founding-era dictionary definitions that pro- vide some support for the Verdugo-Urquidez definition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.