· 6/30/2009
United States v. Huffstatler
Citations
- 571 F.3d 620
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15026
- 2009 WL 1875750
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that district courts may impose a sentence below the child‐pornography guidelines based on a disagreement with them, but district courts are not required to do so
- rejecting reasonableness challenge to sentence substantially above guidelines range where district judge cited fact that previous sentences had not deterred defendant and need to protect society from future serious crimes
- collecting district No. 09-2336 11 court cases relying on this rationale
- collecting district court cases relying on this rationale
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.