Skip to main content
· 6/30/2009

United States v. Huffstatler

Citations

  • 571 F.3d 620
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15026
  • 2009 WL 1875750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that district courts may impose a sentence below the child‐pornography guidelines based on a disagreement with them, but district courts are not required to do so
  • rejecting reasonableness challenge to sentence substantially above guidelines range where district judge cited fact that previous sentences had not deterred defendant and need to protect society from future serious crimes
  • collecting district No. 09-2336 11 court cases relying on this rationale
  • collecting district court cases relying on this rationale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Ripple, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.