Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fourth Circuit· 4/21/1995

United States v. Hoyte

Citations

  • 51 F.3d 1239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that undisclosed evidence that could have been used only to further impeach an already-impeached Government witness did not require a new trial
  • observing that a defendant chal- lenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction bears \a heavy burden\
  • agreeing with the trial court that undisclosed statements “would not have changed the trial’s outcome because [the witness] was impeached in so many other ways”
  • agreeing with the trial court that undisclosed statements “would not have changed the trial’s outcome because [the witness] was impeached in so many other ways”
  • finding no abuse of discretion where replacement counsel was notified of his appointment to represent the defendant less than a month before the trial was scheduled to begin
  • providing stan- dard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eighth, Lay, Luttig, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Hoyte

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.