United States v. Dion R. Hamlin, United States of America v. Dion R. Hamlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that on appeal we review de novo the legal determination whether the officer's actions amount to an arrest
• “the use of handcuffs did not convert the encounter into a custodial arrest because the use was reasonably necessary to protect the officer’s safety.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).