United States v. Howard Eugene Leasure

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 'Agents had observed the property in January and March of 1998 and seen objects consistent with the manufacture of methamphetamine.'
• “Agents had observed the property in January and March of 1998 and seen objects consistent with the manufacture of methamphetamine.”
• six months old information not stale, in part because narcotics operation was elaborate and ongoing
• “A sentencing error is harmless if the district court ‘would have imposed the same sentence absent the errors.’” (quoting United States v. Matsumaru, 244 F.3d 1092, 1106 (9th Cir. 2001)); see also United States v. Ali, 620 F.3d 1062, 1074 (9th Cir. 2010

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).