United States v. Peter Anthony Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that withdrawal was the appropriate remedy because the government’s breaching statements were part of the record that likely would have been examined by a different sentencing judge had specific performance been ordered
• explaining that the Government breached the plea agreement by advocating a position contrary to its agreed-upon recommendation and supporting a position inconsistent with the agreement
• concluding the government breached its promise to recommend a 10-year sentence when it supported the position in the PSI for a longer sentence
• explaining the government is bound by any material promises that induce a defendant to plead guilty
• explaining the government is bound by any material promises that induce a defendant to plead guilty
• allowing the defendant under a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 collateral attack on appeal to withdraw a guilty plea where the government breached the plea agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).