Eleventh Circuit· 3/8/1996

United States v. Peter Anthony Taylor

Citations

77 F.3d 368
1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3995

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that withdrawal was the appropriate remedy because the government’s breaching statements were part of the record that likely would have been examined by a different sentencing judge had specific performance been ordered
explaining that the Government breached the plea agreement by advocating a position contrary to its agreed-upon recommendation and supporting a position inconsistent with the agreement
concluding the government breached its promise to recommend a 10-year sentence when it supported the position in the PSI for a longer sentence
explaining the government is bound by any material promises that induce a defendant to plead guilty
explaining the government is bound by any material promises that induce a defendant to plead guilty
allowing the defendant under a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 collateral attack on appeal to withdraw a guilty plea where the government breached the plea agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Dubina, Carnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.