Tenth Circuit· 1/9/2009

United States v. Hooks

Citations

551 F.3d 1205
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 357
2009 WL 50205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the district court did not plainly err in allowing jury to use transcripts as an aid in listening to a recording without a limiting instruction
“If a defendant fails to specifically object to a fact in the PSR, the fact is deemed admitted by the defendant and the government need not produce additional evidence in support of the admitted fact.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Holloway, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Hooks

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.