Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 9/29/2008

United States v. Schene

Citations

  • 543 F.3d 627
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20465
  • 2008 WL 4379509

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “error in admitting the testimony was not plain” in part because “the jury had already heard similar testimony from [another witness], and the other evidence of [defendant’s] guilt was substantial”
  • holding that there was sufficient evidence to prove that a hard drive found in Oklahoma was a “material” that had traveled in interstate or foreign commerce upon proof that the hard drive was manufactured in Singapore
  • noting that earlier Tenth Circuit case held that “producing” did not encompass copying images onto a computer diskette, but rejecting under plain-error standard appellant’s argument that government failed to satisfy § 2252A(a)(5)(B
  • noting that earlier Tenth Circuit case held that “producing” did not encompass copying images onto a computer diskette, but rejecting under plain-error standard appellant’s argument that government failed to satisfy § 2252A(a)(5)(B
  • upholding admission of uncharged images of child pornography to show defendant “knowingly possessed” charged images
  • affirming district court’s admission of uncharged child pornography images for the purpose of proving the defendant’s intent and knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Seymour, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Schene

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.