United States v. Hilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reinforcing the limited and qualified use of the Dost factors, and concluding, on de novo review of a sentencing determination, that certain images were not lascivious
• reinforcing the limited and qualified use of the Dost factors, and concluding, on de novo review of a sentencing determination, that certain images were not lascivious
• noting that the Dost factors, although generally relevant, are not comprehensive
• applying a six-factor test to determine whether images constitute lascivious exhibition of the genitals and, thus, violate the child pornography statute
• \[P]roof of transmission of pornography over the Internet ... satisfies the interstate commerce element of the offense.\ (citations omitted)
• “[P]roof of transmission of pornography over the Internet or over telephone lines satisfies the interstate commerce element of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).