Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 1/14/2005

United States v. Hendricks

Citations

  • 395 F.3d 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that wiretap statements and statements of defendants or their co-conspirators made in the conversations with confidential informants are non-testimonial
  • holding that statements “surreptitiously intercepted by law enforcement” through wiretaps were non- -8- J-S45009-19 testimonial “because they do not fit within the framework given by Crawford to define ‘testimonial’ statements”
  • “[S]urreptitiously monitored conversations and statements contained in the Title III recordings are not ‘testimonial’ for purposes of Crawford.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.