United States v. Hatch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in deciding a sufficiency challenge courts \must only satisfy [themselves] that the guilty verdict finds support in a plausible rendition of the record\
• referring to the sufficiency of evidence burden as a \daunting hurdle[ ]\
• referring to the sufficiency of evidence burden as a \daunting hurdle[ ]\
• “The government proved, and a rational jury found beyond a reasonable doubt, that the only sensible reading of Question 18 demanded that Hatch report his entire OUI history.”
• “The determination as to [the defendant’s] state of mind — his belief in the untruthfulness of his statement — is one which the jury is best equipped to perform.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Upton
  First Circuit· 2009-03-05· cited 90×
• United States v. Silva
  First Circuit· 2009-01-23· cited 84×
• United States v. Pelletier
  First Circuit· 2011-12-01· cited 62×
• United States v. Dellosantos
  First Circuit· 2011-08-16· cited 58×
• United States v. Boskic
  First Circuit· 2008-10-22· cited 53×
• United States v. Azubike
  First Circuit· 2009-04-29· cited 46×
• United States v. Ortiz
  First Circuit· 2006-05-03· cited 45×
• United States v. Rodriguez-Adorno
  First Circuit· 2012-09-17· cited 44×
• United States v. McDonough
  First Circuit· 2013-08-21· cited 43×
• United States v. Acevedo-Hernandez
  First Circuit· 2018-08-06· cited 29×
• Horn v. Medical Marijuana, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2023-08-21· cited 26×
• United States v. Gaw
  First Circuit· 2016-03-09· cited 25×
• United States v. Ledée
  First Circuit· 2014-11-05· cited 25×
• United States v. Rodriguez-Berrios
  First Circuit· 2009-07-23· cited 22×
• United States v. Colon-Ledee
  First Circuit· 2014-11-05· cited 22×
• United States v. Shaw
  First Circuit· 2012-02-29· cited 21×
• United States v. Dirosa
  First Circuit· 2014-08-04· cited 20×
• United States v. Thompson
  First Circuit· 2006-06-07· cited 19×
• United States v. Alberico
  First Circuit· 2009-03-05· cited 17×
• United States v. Rodríguez-Berríos
  First Circuit· 2009-07-23· cited 16×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. Marsh
  Supreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
• Bronston v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 480×
• United States v. Doherty
  First Circuit· 1989-02-01· cited 156×
• United States v. Gomez
  First Circuit· 2001-07-06· cited 72×
• United States v. Cruzado-Laureano
  First Circuit· 2005-04-05· cited 72×
• United States v. Sebaggala
  First Circuit· 2001-07-16· cited 67×
• United States v. Richard Finucan and Dee Rocca
  First Circuit· 1983-05-26· cited 67×
• United States v. Luis Reveron Martinez
  First Circuit· 1988-01-13· cited 64×
• United States v. Freeman
  First Circuit· 2000-04-14· cited 50×
• United States v. Karen M. McGauley
  First Circuit· 2002-02-05· cited 48×
• United States v. Robert J. Kehoe
  First Circuit· 1977-09-28· cited 35×
• United States v. Jack McNatt
  First Circuit· 1987-03-11· cited 32×
• United States v. Rowe
  First Circuit· 1998-05-08· cited 29×
• United States v. Pamela M. Manapat
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-04-18· cited 28×

Other cases named United States v. Hatch

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Hatch
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-07-03· cited 17×
• United States v. Hatch
  First Circuit· 2008-02-01· cited 9×
• United States v. Hatch
  N.D. Indiana· 1993-07-14· cited 6×
• United States v. Hatch
  U.S. Circuit Court for New York· 1824-04-15· cited 4×
• United States v. Hatch
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2014-07-22
• United States v. Hatch
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2014-09-22
• United States v. Hatch
  D. Maryland· 1864-12-15
• United States v. Hatch
  U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1978-06-27
• United States v. Hatch
  Supreme Court· 1957-06-24