· 8/4/2014
United States v. Dirosa
Citations
- 761 F.3d 144
- 2014 WL 3818686
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14951
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming wire-fraud conviction where the defendant did not personally induce the wire transactions but played a pivotal role in the scheme
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Howard, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.