United States v. Gaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]umulative-error analysis is inappropriate when a party complains of the cumulative effect of non-errors.” (citation omitted)
• “[W]e must affirm each count if the evidence is sufficient for the jury to have convicted [the defendant] under any one of the relevant theories of liability presented to the jury as to that count.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).