United States v. Hatahley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that plaintiffs were entitled to the market value, or replacement cost, of horses and burros unlawfully taken by the United States
• “In arriving at a fair market value of destroyed animals, the court should consider evidence of the availability of like animals, together with all other elements which go to make up market value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).