Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 6/21/1994

United States v. Golden Elevator, Incorporated

Citations

  • 27 F.3d 301
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 459
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15391
  • 1994 WL 270690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a Rule 60(b)(1) motion stands “unless no reasonable person could have acted as the judge did”
  • stating that a Rule 60(b)(1) motion stands \unless no reasonable person could have acted as the judge did\
  • explaining that a dismissal with prejudice is one type of sanction and finding the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing that sanction against the United States after the government repeatedly ignored court orders and deadlines
  • “Fact discovery shall close, without extensions of any kind, by February 28, 2019.”
  • “Ignoring deadlines is the surest way to lose a case.”
  • “Time limits coordinate and expedite a complex process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.