Seventh Circuit· 6/21/1994
United States v. Golden Elevator, Incorporated
Citations
- 27 F.3d 301
- 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 459
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15391
- 1994 WL 270690
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a Rule 60(b)(1) motion stands “unless no reasonable person could have acted as the judge did”
- stating that a Rule 60(b)(1) motion stands \unless no reasonable person could have acted as the judge did\
- explaining that a dismissal with prejudice is one type of sanction and finding the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing that sanction against the United States after the government repeatedly ignored court orders and deadlines
- “Fact discovery shall close, without extensions of any kind, by February 28, 2019.”
- “Ignoring deadlines is the surest way to lose a case.”
- “Time limits coordinate and expedite a complex process.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Wood, Easterbrook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kimball H. Ladien, M.D. v. Boris Astrachan, Gloria Jackson Bacon, and James BarterSeventh Circuit· 1997-10-22· cited 876×
- Milton B. Russell v. Delco Remy Division of General Motors Corporation, Saegertown Manufacturing Company and Jordan ChalmerSeventh Circuit· 1995-04-06· cited 289×
- Arlene Otis v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1994-07-18· cited 180×
- John J. Manley v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2001-01-05· cited 101×
- Israel Travel Advisory Service, Inc., Celia Shar, and Marilyn Ziemke v. Israel Identity Tours, Inc., Larry Ritter, and Marlene RitterSeventh Circuit· 1995-08-14· cited 88×
- Carlos Henderson and Charlie Richardson v. Officer Dennis Bolanda, Star No. 32Seventh Circuit· 2001-05-16· cited 73×
- In re Bluestein & Co.Seventh Circuit· 1995-10-26· cited 68×
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationN.D. Illinois· 2005-08-26· cited 60×
- Ruby Helm v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Great American Savings of Oak ParkSeventh Circuit· 1996-05-21· cited 52×
- Valentino Castro v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Succeeded by the Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesSeventh Circuit· 2000-06-06· cited 45×
- Nancy J. Harris, on Her Own Behalf and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1997-02-27· cited 39×
- Federal Election Commission v. Al Salvi for Senate Committee and Stephanie Mustell, as TreasurerSeventh Circuit· 2000-03-08· cited 36×
- Finwall v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2006-05-31· cited 35×
- In Re Dartmoor Homes, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1994-10-26· cited 27×
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Lake Shore Asset Management Ltd.Seventh Circuit· 2011-05-11· cited 19×
- Xyngular Corp. v. SchenkelD. Utah· 2016-08-02· cited 18×
- Talbert v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2006-07-10· cited 18×
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationN.D. Illinois· 2006-05-24· cited 16×
- Hard Surface Solutions, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.N.D. Illinois· 2010-12-17· cited 15×
- United States v. Amerigroup Illinois, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2005-09-15· cited 13×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court· 1947-11-10· cited 1,581×
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court· 1993-06-14· cited 1,427×
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1990-08-13· cited 1,177×
- Mark A. Ball v. City of Chicago and Alfred S. Schultz, Individually and as Agent of the City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1993-09-16· cited 265×
- Jernigan v. Ashland Oil Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1993-04-26· cited 228×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1980-04-16· cited 143×
- Metlyn Realty Corp. v. Esmark, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1985-05-16· cited 137×
- United States v. 7108 West Grand Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, Feliberto Flores and Isabellita Flores, Claimants-AppellantsSeventh Circuit· 1994-01-25· cited 123×
- Brenda Chilcutt v. United States of America, Randell P. Means, in His Individual CapacityFifth Circuit· 1993-12-22· cited 113×
- Northwestern National Insurance Company v. Robert T. Baltes, DSeventh Circuit· 1994-01-31· cited 85×
- Jeannie Newman v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthoritySeventh Circuit· 1992-04-27· cited 70×
- Dunbar v. Triangle Lumber & Supply Co.Third Circuit· 1987-04-14· cited 41×
- United States v. Medico Industries, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1986-02-27· cited 40×
- Darlene Mattingly, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1991-07-29· cited 33×
- United States v. Ken Mar Associates, Ltd.W.D. Oklahoma· 1987-10-27· cited 6×
- Board of Trustees of Public Employees' Retirement Fund of State of Indiana v. SullivanSeventh Circuit· 1991-07-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.