Skip to main content
· 4/6/1995

Milton B. Russell v. Delco Remy Division of General Motors Corporation, Saegertown Manufacturing Company and Jordan Chalmer

Citations

  • 51 F.3d 746
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 224
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7690
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,512
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 673
  • 1995 WL 149393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts should not consider a Rule 60(b) motion if doing so would “circumvent the ordinary time limitation for filing a notice of appeal.”
  • “[T]he rule may not be used to raise novel legal theories that a party had the ability to address in the first instance.”
  • “Rule 60(b) . . . is not an appropriate vehicle for addressing simple legal error; otherwise, a party could circumvent the ordinary time limitation for filing a notice of appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Cudahy, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.