United States v. Gerald Timms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n Baxstrom, the Supreme Court concluded that a state’s civil commitment scheme violated the Equal Protection Clause, but in so doing, it observed there was no ‘semblance of rationality’ for the statute’s distinctions, thus appearing to apply rational basis review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).