Timothy Seeboth v. Cliff Allenby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding on habeas review of state court proceedings that “state courts reasonably may apply the rational basis test when considering equal protection challenges to civil commitment laws”
• noting that the state court’s determination that parties were not similarly-situated “amounts to a determination that the state has a constitutionally sufficient reason for treating the groups differently”
• “We have held that citation to Duvall and Swain together constitutes ‘dismissal without prejudice, with leave to amend to plead required facts with particularity.’” (quoting Cross, 676 F.3d at 1177)
• “We have held that citation to Duvall and Swain together constitutes ‘dismissal without prejudice, with leave to amend to plead required facts with particularity.’ ” (quoting Cross, 676 F.3d at 1177)
• pin citation to Duvall discussing the “substantive requirements for habeas petitioners,” “including the requirement to plead facts sufficient to state a claim” was an adjudication on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).