United States v. Mikel Bolander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming commitment order under the Act where defendant was convicted of one hands-on sex offense
• affirming district court’s commitment order because possession of child pornography “support[s] a finding that [appellant] would have serious difficulty refraining from acts of child molestation if he was released because of his pedophilia”
• “[I]t was incumbent upon [the privilege holder] to assert the psychotherapist-patient privilege in a timely fashion, rather than waiting until the eleventh hour to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).