Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 4/19/2023

United States v. Gemar

Citations

  • 65 F.4th 777

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court abused its discretion by declining to individually question a juror when that juror’s poten- tial bias came to light after trial
  • “Based on this information [about Juror 27], Gemar moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33.”
  • “Although not every claim of actual bias on behalf of a juror militates a hearing, the district court here abused its discretion by ruling on [Gemar’s] motion for a new trial without holding an evidentiary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Gemar

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.