Fifth Circuit· 8/7/2003
Solis v. Cockrell
Citations
- 342 F.3d 392
- 2003 WL 21805237
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding no presumption of bias arose where a member of the jury in a burglary case failed to disclose during voir dire he knew the accused and had heard rumors the accused and the accused’s brothers had committed other burglaries
- “Following Justice O’Connor's concurrence in Smith our circuit has recognized the implied bias doctrine, albeit with carefully watched limits.”
- “Following Justice O’Connor’s concurrence in Smith our circuit has 5 Case: 24-20112 Document: 103-1 Page: 6 Date Filed: 01/28/2026 No. 24-20112 recognized the implied bias doctrine, albeit with carefully watched limits.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dennis, Emilio, Garza, Higginbotham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenSixth Circuit· 2004-08-13· cited 361×
- State v. MoralesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-14· cited 274×
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-30· cited 161×
- John Lee Conaway v. Marvin Polk, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina North Carolina Attorney GeneralFourth Circuit· 2006-07-11· cited 90×
- Wright v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2006-11-17· cited 54×
- Hatten v. QuartermanFifth Circuit· 2009-06-05· cited 49×
- Uranga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-11-17· cited 40×
- Brooks v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2005-07-20· cited 40×
- United States v. Ricardo MitchellThird Circuit· 2012-08-07· cited 37×
- Uranga v. DavisFifth Circuit· 2018-06-18· cited 22×
- Gutierrez v. DretkeW.D. Texas· 2005-09-27· cited 14×
- John Uranga, III v. Lorie Davis, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2018-01-12· cited 10×
- Cervantes Salazar v. DretkeW.D. Texas· 2005-09-27· cited 8×
- United States v. GemarFifth Circuit· 2023-04-19· cited 3×
- Matthews v. CainE.D. Louisiana· 2018-08-29· cited 2×
- State v. GlassOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-16· cited 2×
- Johnson v. CainE.D. Louisiana· 2014-12-18· cited 1×
- Ingram v. GoodwinW.D. Louisiana· 2013-11-01· cited 1×
- Brooks v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2006-03-28
- Franklin, B. J.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-30
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationFifth Circuit· 1996-03-28· cited 8,052×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 1,568×
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,407×
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 1,211×
- Miller v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 2000-02-24· cited 1,099×
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 727×
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 521×
- Alfred R. Dyer v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 1998-08-06· cited 319×
- United States v. Julio GonzalezNinth Circuit· 2000-06-15· cited 156×
- Andrews v. CollinsFifth Circuit· 1994-05-12· cited 133×
- United States v. BishopFifth Circuit· 2001-08-29· cited 125×
- United States v. FrostSixth Circuit· 1997-12-16· cited 107×
- Ronald Lee Fitzgerald v. Fred W. Greene, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional CenterFourth Circuit· 1998-07-13· cited 98×
- United States v. BrownFifth Circuit· 1998-11-16· cited 96×
- Leonard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 96×
- United States v. GreerSecond Circuit· 2002-03-07· cited 86×
- United States v. Fred Scott, Raymond Peacock and Lawrence CathaFifth Circuit· 1988-08-25· cited 82×
- Gerald Glenn Johnson v. Bill ArmontroutEighth Circuit· 1992-04-10· cited 80×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.