United States v. Gary Dewitt Odom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant waived his speedy trial right under the IAD because defense counsel requested a continuance that resulted in a trial date after the expiration of the deadline
• applying \the principle that related statutes having the same purpose should be construed together\ in interpreting the IAD and the STA
• prisoner waived his statutory right by consenting to a continuance
• “Whenever possible, the interpretation of the Acts should not be discordant.”
• “Whenever possible, the interpretation of the Acts should not be discordant.”
• defendant waived 120-day limit by seeking continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).