United States v. Luna-Acosta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts can freely correct their initial oral sentencings at any point before the sentencing hearing is adjourned
• concluding there was no formal break in proceedings because “most important[ly]” the district court “continued the first hearing . . . without finalizing all of the terms” or permitting the parties to object
• “A district court’s ability to modify a sentence . . . is jurisdictional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).