Second Circuit· 5/2/1996
United States v. Frank E. Ready
Citations
- 82 F.3d 551
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10055
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that waiver of right to appeal was not knowingly made where the district court did not mention the right to appeal or explain the consequences of waiving this right
- “[N]o circuit has held that these contractual waivers are enforceable on a basis that is unlimited and unexamined.”
- “Every circuit to consider the issue has concluded that waivers of the right to appeal a sentence, like waivers of constitutional rights, are invalid unless they are voluntary and knowing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Melaughlin, Jacobs, Calabresi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. HahnTenth Circuit· 2004-03-04· cited 1,193×
- United States v. Lydia CooperThird Circuit· 2006-02-14· cited 959×
- United States v. ManiganFourth Circuit· 2010-01-26· cited 545×
- United States v. David Williams, IIIFourth Circuit· 2016-01-28· cited 228×
- United States v. Marvis H. BownesSeventh Circuit· 2005-05-24· cited 205×
- United States v. Gomez-PerezSecond Circuit· 2000-06-15· cited 196×
- United States v. Danilo HernandezSecond Circuit· 2001-03-08· cited 176×
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-08-11· cited 155×
- State v. MellonTennessee Supreme Court· 2003-10-30· cited 127×
- United States v. Deinner RosaSecond Circuit· 1997-08-19· cited 107×
- United States v. BlackTenth Circuit· 2000-01-27· cited 103×
- United States v. Kamadeen Idowu OladimejiSecond Circuit· 2006-09-12· cited 93×
- United States v. RiggiSecond Circuit· 2011-08-10· cited 91×
- United States v. Pamela MillerSixth Circuit· 2012-10-16· cited 91×
- United States v. Judith Monzon, Also Known as MitiSecond Circuit· 2004-02-18· cited 81×
- United States v. Steven Ira CohenFourth Circuit· 2006-08-17· cited 78×
- United States v. Alberto J. RieraSecond Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 69×
- United States v. Angel L. Martinez-Rios, Sr., Abraham Garcia, and Richard DanzigerSecond Circuit· 1998-05-04· cited 65×
- United States v. NourseSecond Circuit· 2013-07-16· cited 64×
- United States v. PearsonSecond Circuit· 2009-07-02· cited 58×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- United States v. James BushertEleventh Circuit· 1993-08-04· cited 863×
- Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court· 1985-04-23· cited 590×
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court· 1995-01-18· cited 504×
- United States v. Herbert John MarinFourth Circuit· 1992-04-13· cited 498×
- Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 353×
- United States v. Langford WigginsFourth Circuit· 1990-05-29· cited 347×
- United States v. Brian MelanconFifth Circuit· 1992-10-08· cited 310×
- United States v. Michael Lee HarveyFourth Circuit· 1986-05-22· cited 295×
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloNinth Circuit· 1990-10-12· cited 252×
- United States v. Nicholas Arthur PortilloFifth Circuit· 1994-04-19· cited 246×
- United States v. JacobsonSecond Circuit· 1994-01-19· cited 184×
- United States v. Alberto De La FuenteNinth Circuit· 1993-10-27· cited 167×
- Walsh v. SchlechtSupreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 159×
- United States v. Dolan, John E.Third Circuit· 1978-01-23· cited 149×
Other cases named United States v. Frank E. Ready
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.