· 8/1/2002
United States v. Alberto J. Riera
Citations
- 298 F.3d 128
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15681
- 2002 WL 1770529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the government’s representations to the court that it was not seeking an upward departure suggested it had not breached the plea agreement
- holding that the government’s letter in response to the district court’s inquiry regarding a Guidelines adjustment did not breach the plea agreement in part because “the government [] repeatedly emphasized that it was not advocating an upward departure”
- stressing that the government’s statement was in response to a direct inquiry by the district court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cardamone, Winter, Sack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.