Skip to main content
· 8/1/2002

United States v. Alberto J. Riera

Citations

  • 298 F.3d 128
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15681
  • 2002 WL 1770529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the government’s representations to the court that it was not seeking an upward departure suggested it had not breached the plea agreement
  • holding that the government’s letter in response to the district court’s inquiry regarding a Guidelines adjustment did not breach the plea agreement in part because “the government [] repeatedly emphasized that it was not advocating an upward departure”
  • stressing that the government’s statement was in response to a direct inquiry by the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Winter, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.