United States v. Abel v. Quijada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to distinguish between legal and factual impossibility and stating that \generally a defendant should be treated in accordance with the facts as he supposed them to be\
• due process permitted third trial after two mistrials, absent harassment by prosecutor
• eschewing any effort to distinguish between the two concepts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).