United States v. Warren Brown, A/K/A Prince Asiel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s dismissal of a juror after five weeks of deliberations violated the defendant’s right to a unanimous jury, because the record evidence suggested the juror found the evidence insufficient for a conviction
• holding that the district court’s dismissal of a juror after five weeks of deliberations violated the defendant’s right to a unanimous jury, because the record evidence suggested the juror found the evidence insufficient for a conviction
• holding that the district court’s dismissal of a juror after five weeks of deliberations violated the defendant’s right to a unanimous jury, because the record evidence suggested the juror found the evidence insufficient for a conviction
• holding that the district court’s dismissal of a juror after five weeks of deliberations violated the defendant’s right to a unanimous jury, because the record evidence suggested the juror found the evidence insufficient for a conviction
• finding that a “logical relationship” existed between the RICO predicate acts and those not charged as predicate acts since they were committed at the same times, by the same persons, and in accordance with the same general methods
• discharging deliberating juror for reasons related to his or her doubts about government's evidence is \unacceptable under the [United States] Constitution\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).