United States v. Eric Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that expert testimony was sufficient to prove the interstate commerce element of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) where the expert testified that the firearm was manufactured in a state other than the state in which the defendant possessed it
• ″The information stamped on the handgun showing the place of manufacture is data of a type reasonably relied upon by firearms experts.″

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).