United States v. Stephen Erhart, Also Known as Stephen Anthony Erhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving the relationship between a chiropractor and the insurance companies to which he submitted claims for reimbursement
• rejecting chiropractor’s argument under § 3B1.3 that he did not occupy a position of private trust with insurers because “the insurance companies were exacting in their examination of his bill submissions”
• “[T]he simple fact that a defendant recruits new members into a conspiracy supports a finding of the defendant being a manager or supervisor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).